<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Evolution of Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devlounge.net/design/the-evolution-of-design/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devlounge.net/design/the-evolution-of-design</link>
	<description>Design, Develop, and Grow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Trupp</title>
		<link>http://www.devlounge.net/design/the-evolution-of-design/comment-page-1#comment-8102</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Trupp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devlounge.net/articles/the-evolution-of-design#comment-8102</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the theme and spirit of this article, but I wished that designers &amp; developers would redirect their focus from their fixation with the underlying technologies, towards the part that the user cares about... the end product.  I admit excessive use of tables overly complicates the internal page structure, slows load times, and can create maintenance headaches... but after looking at some the webs most successful sites (craigslist, myspace, ebay, amazon, youtube, etc.) it is obvious that their use doesn&#039;t equal to a site&#039;s failure.  Ripping a site apart for this is like criticizing a painter for his choice of canvas.  It&#039;s time to start looking at the frontend &amp; functionality again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the theme and spirit of this article, but I wished that designers &amp; developers would redirect their focus from their fixation with the underlying technologies, towards the part that the user cares about&#8230; the end product.  I admit excessive use of tables overly complicates the internal page structure, slows load times, and can create maintenance headaches&#8230; but after looking at some the webs most successful sites (craigslist, myspace, ebay, amazon, youtube, etc.) it is obvious that their use doesn&#8217;t equal to a site&#8217;s failure.  Ripping a site apart for this is like criticizing a painter for his choice of canvas.  It&#8217;s time to start looking at the frontend &amp; functionality again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronalfy</title>
		<link>http://www.devlounge.net/design/the-evolution-of-design/comment-page-1#comment-4891</link>
		<dc:creator>ronalfy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 03:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devlounge.net/articles/the-evolution-of-design#comment-4891</guid>
		<description>I like the comparison to how the sites were designed yesteryear and today.  Perhaps another good evolution of design would be CNET.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the comparison to how the sites were designed yesteryear and today.  Perhaps another good evolution of design would be CNET.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

