<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You Tempted to Soup up Your Website?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devlounge.net/strategy/are-you-tempted-to-soup-up-your-website/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devlounge.net/strategy/are-you-tempted-to-soup-up-your-website</link>
	<description>Design, Develop, and Grow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Huereca</title>
		<link>http://www.devlounge.net/strategy/are-you-tempted-to-soup-up-your-website/comment-page-1#comment-31908</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Huereca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devlounge.net/articles/are-you-tempted-to-soup-up-your-website#comment-31908</guid>
		<description>tsk, 

I apologize for the rather late reply to your comment.  I just now noticed your comment.

If something is fielded (ie, put out into the real world), that product and/or feature has one chance to make an impression.  If that product and/or feature works as intended, then it will be used.  However, if the product and/or feature requires hoops and extra steps that the user is not willing to make, then that product and/or feature is pretty much unusable.

So I agree with your statement that without unique features, there will be no growth.  However, the unique feature better work and require little thought to use &lt;em&gt;the first time.&lt;/em&gt;

Thank you for your comment.

Ronald</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tsk, </p>
<p>I apologize for the rather late reply to your comment.  I just now noticed your comment.</p>
<p>If something is fielded (ie, put out into the real world), that product and/or feature has one chance to make an impression.  If that product and/or feature works as intended, then it will be used.  However, if the product and/or feature requires hoops and extra steps that the user is not willing to make, then that product and/or feature is pretty much unusable.</p>
<p>So I agree with your statement that without unique features, there will be no growth.  However, the unique feature better work and require little thought to use <em>the first time.</em></p>
<p>Thank you for your comment.</p>
<p>Ronald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsk</title>
		<link>http://www.devlounge.net/strategy/are-you-tempted-to-soup-up-your-website/comment-page-1#comment-28033</link>
		<dc:creator>tsk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devlounge.net/articles/are-you-tempted-to-soup-up-your-website#comment-28033</guid>
		<description>I have a comment on one of your points: &quot;It is very unlikely that a user will take the time and effort to learn a feature that is unique to your site.&quot;

I think usability comes form intuitive design and functionality. Make the tool do what the users hope and think it does.

To say that people won&#039;t take the time to use a unique feature you&#039;d put an end to development on the web. Unique features show up all the time. Only a handful are useful and usable without any instructions and a few evolve into something we take for granted. 

Take contact forms. I bet these were unique features in their time.

I strongly believe that a feature that is intuitive, useful and easy to use will make a difference in the overall functionality of a web site.

Otherwise, this was a great article to read. I like the fact that you use real-world examples to emphasize what you mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a comment on one of your points: &#8220;It is very unlikely that a user will take the time and effort to learn a feature that is unique to your site.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think usability comes form intuitive design and functionality. Make the tool do what the users hope and think it does.</p>
<p>To say that people won&#8217;t take the time to use a unique feature you&#8217;d put an end to development on the web. Unique features show up all the time. Only a handful are useful and usable without any instructions and a few evolve into something we take for granted. </p>
<p>Take contact forms. I bet these were unique features in their time.</p>
<p>I strongly believe that a feature that is intuitive, useful and easy to use will make a difference in the overall functionality of a web site.</p>
<p>Otherwise, this was a great article to read. I like the fact that you use real-world examples to emphasize what you mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronalfy</title>
		<link>http://www.devlounge.net/strategy/are-you-tempted-to-soup-up-your-website/comment-page-1#comment-5143</link>
		<dc:creator>ronalfy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devlounge.net/articles/are-you-tempted-to-soup-up-your-website#comment-5143</guid>
		<description>An excellent podcast covering roughly same material was released on Boagworld today: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boagworld.com/archives/2006/10/podcast_56_to_implement_or_not.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;To implement, or not to implement&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent podcast covering roughly same material was released on Boagworld today: <a href="http://www.boagworld.com/archives/2006/10/podcast_56_to_implement_or_not.html" rel="nofollow">To implement, or not to implement</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

