Feature
Post

Category
Strategy


New Ad Formats for Blogs Sneaking Out

When monetizing a blog most people tend to put up a bunch of 125×125 pixel ads, something of an unofficial standard. I believe this is Michael Arrington’s doing, the relaunched version of TechCrunch (which we’re seeing an updated iteration of today) introduced this in a wider scale, at least to me, and bloggers happily jumped on the bandwagon.

The concept is sound, 125×125 pixel ads aren’t obtrusive, they’re small, lightweight, but still gets the message out there.

Problem is, when putting 8 or even 10 of these in a two column layout you’ll get a cluttered block that looks worse than a set of larger ads would.

The New Format?

But maybe there’s a new format in town to gain ground. The GigaOm network runs 300×100 pixel ads in their sidebars, which looks clean compared to the 125×125 pixel ones found on TechCrunch.

sidebaradsgigaomtechcrunch.jpg

While I think 300×100 pixels is a pretty decent size, design-wise, I believe it is better to look at what default sizes are being offered and sold by ad networks. The closest one is the not so common 250×120 pixels, the half square ad (being 250×250 pixel, or sometimes 250×240 pixels, hence the “half” part). This is an ad that works well in sidebars as well, without being to obtrusive.

Incidentally, both these ad formats (300×100 pixels and 250×120 pixels) offer the advertiser a total of 30,000 pixels to work with.

The Future of Blog Ads

With blogs being more like traditional websites, we’ll see more traditional ad formats. That’s the good thing with the 125×125 pixel ads, there are several mainstream ad networks (such as Google Adsense) that will offer this size, whereas 300×100 pixels is something of an in-house creation from Giga Omni Media. I do think that 300×100 pixels is a better aspect than 250×120 pixels, but when running the latter I’ve been able to get media agencies to push out ads on my site, rather than having to have the one odd ad spot breaking my design.

Big shot blogs are already running traditional ad sizes, just look at the Gawker (Lifehacker, Gizmodo and more) and Weblogs Inc. (Engadget, TUAW and more) blogs out there. This is because they reach a mainstream audience (as opposed to the TechCrunch ones, for instance), and that mainstream advertisers used to the traditional ad formats.

Both the TechCrunch and the GigaOm network are running traditional ad spots as well, with the leaderboard ad (728×90 pixels, “the new banner” size) being the most common ground here. They are also running squares, like the 300×250 pixel ad found in GigaOm’s sidebar, and the 160×600 pixel skyscraper ad on TechCrunch.

What’s Your Poison?

Think about this when you design the ad spots for your next blog.

  • Is your crowd mainstream? If yes, look to traditional ad format.
  • Is your crowd very much web 2.0 new media-ish? Then you won’t go wrong with either, and might even get away with a custom size if your readership is enough to get the advertisers to do custom ads just for you.
  • Is your crowd the same as the blogosphere itself? Then stick to your 125×125 pixel ads for now, but be at the ready!

What ad sizes do you prefer, and why?


  1. By Stefan posted on July 23, 2008 at 4:32 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Hm, i think that 300×100 is quite okay. The square ones at TechCrunch are nice and not distracting, but they don’t ship any message. Yours are too wide and limit the possibilities of fancy contents.

    I think it’s time to rethink about ads. Your considerations are a first step away from those big, annoying banners we meet since ’98..

  2. By Stephan Miller posted on July 23, 2008 at 6:48 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    I think the 125×125 is a little tired. I do like the 300×100 a bit better. I am glad are alternatives. It seemed shortly after the 125×125 format showed up, it became the default ad format for every blogger.

  3. By Thord Daniel Hedengren posted on July 23, 2008 at 7:13 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    @Stefan,
    Actually, the ones on Devlounge now is 290×50 pixels, but I suspect you mean that they don’t offer enough real estate to really pop out, like a 250×120 pixel ad would. I do agree with you though, the ads here on Devlounge isn’t ideal, but they are sold and we’ll have to stick with them until the contracts run out, when we’ll replace them with something else.

    @Stephan Miller,
    I believe the blogosphere was so impressed by Arrington’s success that they just jumped on the bandwagon without a second thought. I think 125×125 pixels is OK if there’s 4 of them, or maybe 6 if you can have some creative control, but I do prefer other sizes.

  4. By Steven Snell posted on July 23, 2008 at 9:06 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    I’m going with 234 x 60 on my new blog. Not too much different from yours – a little taller and less width. I just like the look of this type of ad better than the 125 x 125 that I’m using at my other blogs. I do think it can be easier on advertisers to offer 125 x 125 because they all have those ads already created.

  5. By web pixy posted on July 25, 2008 at 9:32 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    I think that 300×100 ads look much more natural in any blog page and I personally prefer them. Of course, it depends on there position.

  6. By Drew posted on July 26, 2008 at 7:22 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Any web site, regardless of size, should stick to standard ad formats. I used to work at a web site with significant traffic that used non-format sizes and found that as soon as I converted the site design to support standard spacing revenue shot up drastically.

    It wasn’t any one big purchase, it was that agency customers found it easy to just spend a few thousand dollars “testing the waters”. The barrier to entry, custom creative in this case, was removed and sales started flooding in.

    I can not stress enough how much more revenue sites that use standard ad sizes generate.

  7. By PremiumWP posted on July 31, 2008 at 3:07 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    I have always avoided the 125×125 ads which most bloggers use, as they seem to be losing their impact now. I have tried a couple of different sizes including 300×100 as well as 234×60 and both formats do very well.

  8. By jive posted on August 8, 2008 at 2:38 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Unless you run a big website you have to use the IAB standard sizes for ads pretty much.

  9. TrackbackDUI - DUI Daily: 7/29/08